“We cannot escape the reality that climate change will displace millions. It’s no longer a question of if, but when.”
— Ban Ki-moon, Former UN Secretary-General
Introduction
The phenomenon of climate-induced displacement is one of the most pressing humanitarian challenges of our time, with rising sea levels and extreme weather events threatening the lives and livelihoods of millions. Since 2008, over 376 million people have been displaced due to natural disasters, including floods, droughts, and storms, a trend that is expected to intensify as climate change progresses. The Institute for Economics and Peace warns that as many as 1.2 billion people could be displaced by 2050 if the current trajectory continues.[1]
Despite its growing impact, the legal recognition and protection of individuals displaced by climate-induced factors remain insufficient. The 1951 Refugee Convention[2], the cornerstone of international refugee law, does not address displacement caused by environmental factors, leaving “climate refugees” in a legal limbo. While frameworks like the 2018 Global Compact for Migration[3] have acknowledged climate as a driver of migration, they lack enforceable mechanisms to address the rights and needs of those forcibly displaced.
This essay explores the critical intersections between climate change and human displacement, highlighting the gaps in current legal mechanisms and emphasizing the urgency for a coherent international response. By leveraging insights from key global initiatives such as the Paris Agreement and the Nansen Initiative, it underscores the necessity of establishing a comprehensive legal framework to uphold the rights and dignity of climate-displaced individuals.
The climate crisis and its impact on human displacement
The climate crisis is one of the most pressing global challenges of the 21st century. Its far-reaching consequences extend beyond environmental degradation to deeply affect social, economic, and geopolitical landscapes. Among these consequences, climate-induced displacement has emerged as a critical issue, forcing millions to abandon their homes due to the devastating impacts of rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and environmental degradation. This chapter examines the interplay between climate change and human displacement, emphasizing the urgent need for robust legal frameworks to address this escalating crisis. Climate change is intensifying due to rising greenhouse gas emissions, causing global temperatures to increase at an unprecedented rate. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the planet has already warmed by approximately 1.1°C above pre-industrial levels, with significant repercussions for ecosystems and human societies[4]. One of the most visible effects is the rise in sea levels, primarily caused by thermal expansion and melting polar ice caps. By 2100, sea levels are projected to rise by 0.5 to 1.1 meters under high-emission scenarios[5]. This rise endangers coastal communities, particularly in low-lying countries such as Bangladesh, the Maldives, and small island developing states, where land and livelihoods are at immediate risk.
“The survival of small island nations depends on the conscience of the world.”
— Anote Tong, Former President of Kiribati
The displacement caused by climate change is multifaceted, involving both sudden-onset and slow-onset events. Sudden-onset disasters, such as hurricanes and floods, can displace populations instantly, often with catastrophic consequences. For example, Hurricane Maria in 2017 displaced over 135,000 residents from Puerto Rico, many of whom have struggled to return due to infrastructural and economic challenges[6]. On the other hand, slow-onset phenomena, such as desertification and sea-level rise, gradually render areas uninhabitable, leading to prolonged displacement. Studies estimate that by 2050, between 25 million and 1 billion people could be displaced due to climate-related factors, with the most conservative estimates still exceeding 200 million[7]. The impact of climate-induced displacement is not uniform but disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. Low-income communities, indigenous groups, and those in developing nations often bear the brunt of climate impacts due to limited adaptive capacity and resources. Coastal megacities like Jakarta and Manila, with their high population densities and inadequate infrastructure, are particularly vulnerable to rising seas[8]. Moreover, gender and age dynamics exacerbate vulnerability, as women, children, and the elderly often face greater challenges in accessing assistance and rebuilding their lives post-displacement[9].
Despite the growing scale of climate-induced displacement, there remains a significant void in international legal protections for affected individuals. Climate migrants are not explicitly recognized under the 1951 Refugee Convention, which focuses on persecution-based displacement. This legal gap leaves millions of displaced individuals in a precarious position, often without access to basic rights such as asylum, healthcare, and education in host countries[10]. Although some regional frameworks, such as the Kampala Convention, provide limited protections, they lack global applicability and enforcement mechanisms. Addressing the nexus between climate change and human displacement requires a multi-pronged approach, combining mitigation, adaptation, and legal innovation. Strengthening global commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is paramount to curbing future displacement. Simultaneously, adaptive strategies, such as building resilient infrastructure and implementing early warning systems, can help communities withstand climate impacts. Most importantly, there is an urgent need to develop an international legal framework that recognizes and protects the rights of climate-displaced individuals. Without such measures, the world risks exacerbating inequalities and destabilizing regions already grappling with climate-related challenges.
Vulnerable populations: Unequal impacts of climate displacement
Climate-induced displacement disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, exacerbating existing social and economic inequalities. Marginalised groups such as low-income households, indigenous communities, and residents of small island developing states are at the forefront of this crisis. These populations often live in high-risk areas like floodplains or informal settlements, where inadequate infrastructure leaves them particularly susceptible to extreme weather events. For example, the Inuit people in the Arctic face the destruction of their traditional livelihoods as melting ice and permafrost disrupt ecosystems critical to their survival[11]. Similarly, small island nations such as Tuvalu and the Maldives confront an existential threat from rising sea levels, with entire communities at risk of permanent displacement and cultural erasure[12]. The convergence of environmental hazards and systemic inequalities underscores the urgent need for tailored strategies to protect these groups.
Gender, age, and other intersecting factors further amplify vulnerabilities among displaced populations. Women, for instance, often face disproportionate risks due to societal roles that limit their access to resources and decision-making power. Research shows that women are more likely to experience violence and exploitation during displacement, particularly in overcrowded camps or conflict zones[13]. Children and the elderly are also uniquely vulnerable, as they are less equipped to cope with the health and psychological impacts of displacement. According to the World Health Organization, children bear a disproportionate burden of climate-related health issues, such as malnutrition and vector-borne diseases, which are exacerbated by the disruption of ecosystems[14]. Addressing these intersectional vulnerabilities requires policies that consider not only environmental risks but also the socio-cultural factors that heighten exposure for specific groups.
The impacts of climate-induced displacement differ sharply between urban and rural contexts, reflecting distinct challenges in each setting. Coastal megacities like Jakarta and Mumbai face heightened risks from sea-level rise and flooding, placing millions of residents and critical infrastructure in jeopardy[15]. In rural areas, where livelihoods often depend on climate-sensitive sectors like agriculture and fishing, prolonged droughts and desertification force communities to abandon their lands and migrate to urban centers. This rural-to-urban migration places additional strain on overcrowded cities, perpetuating a cycle of vulnerability as displaced individuals face unemployment, inadequate housing, and limited access to services. Such dynamics reveal the need for comprehensive approaches that address both urban and rural dimensions of climate displacement while ensuring sustainable support systems for migrants and host communities alike.
Displacement also brings significant humanitarian consequences, including the loss of livelihoods, cultural heritage, and community cohesion. For indigenous peoples, displacement often severs ancestral ties to land, disrupting social and spiritual connections integral to their identity[16]. The influx of displaced individuals into host communities can create tensions over resource allocation, sometimes exacerbating xenophobia and social conflicts. These challenges highlight the importance of proactive policies that not only mitigate displacement but also foster social integration and equitable resource sharing. Without targeted interventions, vulnerable populations will continue to bear the heaviest burden of climate-induced displacement, underscoring the need for inclusive and equitable global responses.
Legal gaps and challenges in protecting climate migrants
The legal frameworks addressing displacement fail to adequately recognize and protect individuals displaced by climate change. The cornerstone of international refugee law, the 1951 Refugee Convention, does not extend its protections to those fleeing environmental crises. This omission is rooted in the Convention’s definition of refugees as individuals persecuted based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. Consequently, climate migrants, who flee life-threatening environmental degradation or disasters, lack the legal standing to seek asylum or international protection[17]. For instance, the Pacific Island nations most affected by rising seas cannot claim refugee status for their populations under the current legal framework, leaving millions vulnerable and without recourse.
In the absence of comprehensive international protections, regional frameworks and ad hoc agreements have emerged, but they remain insufficient. The Kampala Convention in Africa provides some recognition for displacement caused by natural disasters but is geographically limited and lacks robust enforcement mechanisms[18]. Similarly, countries such as New Zealand and Australia have experimented with limited climate visa programs, yet these are not scaled to address the full scope of displacement. National approaches often prioritize economic or geopolitical interests over humanitarian concerns, as seen in policies that restrict entry or resettlement for climate migrants. This piecemeal response highlights the global failure to establish a coordinated legal strategy, leaving significant gaps in protection for displaced populations.
Enforcement challenges compound these legal gaps. Even where protections exist, implementation often falters due to political resistance, resource constraints, or jurisdictional ambiguities. Host countries may be reluctant to extend protections to climate migrants, fearing economic burdens or social tensions. For instance, debates over resettlement funding for displaced Pacific Islanders in Australia have underscored the political sensitivity of climate migration[19]. Moreover, international bodies tasked with addressing displacement frequently lack the authority or resources to enforce compliance, resulting in inconsistent application of even limited legal measures. This lack of global governance creates a vacuum where vulnerable populations are left to navigate complex bureaucratic systems with little support.
Addressing the legal void requires innovative and inclusive solutions that integrate climate migration into existing international law while creating new mechanisms for protection. Proposals such as expanding the Refugee Convention’s definition or establishing a dedicated treaty for climate migrants offer pathways forward but face significant political and practical hurdles. Without bold action, the growing scale of climate displacement will continue to outpace the legal frameworks designed to address it, perpetuating inequities and undermining global stability. The urgency of this crisis demands a unified and proactive response to ensure that those displaced by climate change are not left without protection or dignity.
Towards legal innovation: Proposals for protecting climate migrants
As climate-induced displacement accelerates, the inadequacy of existing legal frameworks necessitates innovative approaches to protect affected populations. The international community has proposed various solutions, including expanding the definition of refugees under the 1951 Refugee Convention or creating a new legal instrument specifically addressing climate migration. Expanding the Refugee Convention could provide immediate protections, but it faces significant political resistance from states concerned about broader migration implications[20]. Alternatively, establishing a dedicated climate migration treaty would allow for tailored solutions, such as temporary protection visas or resettlement programs. Such a treaty could incorporate principles of shared responsibility, ensuring that wealthier nations contribute proportionally to relocation and adaptation efforts for climate-displaced populations[21].
Rights-based approaches are central to protecting the dignity and well-being of climate migrants. These approaches emphasize granting displaced individuals access to basic human rights, including education, healthcare, and employment, regardless of their legal status. For instance, some countries, like Fiji, have adopted progressive policies that aim to integrate displaced communities into their social fabric while preserving cultural heritage[22]. International human rights frameworks, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, provide a foundation for these efforts, but practical implementation remains inconsistent. Advocates argue for codifying climate migration protections within broader human rights treaties to ensure enforceability and global applicability[23].
Financial and technical mechanisms also play a critical role in addressing the challenges of climate-induced displacement. Initiatives such as the Green Climate Fund and Loss and Damage Mechanism under the Paris Agreement offer potential funding sources for adaptation and resettlement programs[24]. However, these funds are often limited and subject to complex allocation processes, which can delay critical assistance to affected communities. Additionally, innovative tools like climate risk insurance and community relocation funds could provide localized support, enabling vulnerable populations to rebuild their lives more effectively. Technical support, such as early warning systems and sustainable infrastructure development, further complements legal protections by reducing displacement risks and enhancing resilience.
Ultimately, global cooperation is indispensable for addressing the multifaceted challenges of climate migration. A multilateral approach that combines legal innovation, financial commitment, and technical expertise can create a comprehensive framework for managing climate-induced displacement. Such cooperation must prioritize equity, ensuring that the voices of vulnerable populations are central to policymaking. Without unified action, the gap between the scale of displacement and the adequacy of responses will continue to widen, exacerbating social and economic inequalities. Legal innovation is not merely an option but a necessity to safeguard the rights and futures of those displaced by the climate crisis.
Adapting to the future: Mitigation and resilience strategies
Addressing the challenges of climate-induced displacement requires a proactive focus on both mitigation and adaptation strategies to reduce the root causes of displacement and enhance the resilience of vulnerable communities. Mitigation efforts, particularly those aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, are critical to curbing the long-term impacts of climate change. Policies aligned with the Paris Agreement, such as transitioning to renewable energy, reducing deforestation, and implementing carbon pricing, can help slow global warming and prevent the escalation of displacement risks[25]. However, current commitments from nations remain insufficient to limit temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, leaving millions at risk of displacement if more ambitious actions are not taken[26].
Adaptation strategies, on the other hand, focus on equipping communities with the tools and resources to withstand climate impacts. Building resilient infrastructure in high-risk areas, such as sea walls, flood defenses, and climate-proof housing, is essential to protecting coastal and low-lying regions[27]. In addition to physical infrastructure, ecosystem-based approaches, such as mangrove restoration and wetland conservation, can provide natural buffers against flooding and storm surges. Community-based adaptation initiatives, which involve local populations in planning and decision-making, have proven particularly effective in addressing specific vulnerabilities while fostering social cohesion. For example, participatory adaptation projects in the Philippines have empowered residents to implement disaster risk reduction measures tailored to their unique needs[28].
The integration of technological innovations into adaptation strategies further enhances resilience. Early warning systems, powered by advanced meteorological data and artificial intelligence, can provide timely alerts to populations at risk of extreme weather events, minimizing loss of life and property[29]. Similarly, the use of geospatial technologies to map and monitor vulnerable regions enables governments and aid organizations to allocate resources more effectively. These technological solutions must be paired with equitable policies to ensure that all populations, including those in marginalized or remote areas, can benefit from advancements.
Ultimately, the success of mitigation and adaptation strategies depends on global cooperation and the mobilization of resources. Wealthier nations have a moral and practical responsibility to support developing countries, which often lack the capacity to implement large-scale resilience measures despite being disproportionately affected by climate change[30]. Collaborative frameworks, such as the Green Climate Fund, offer avenues for resource sharing, but their effectiveness hinges on transparency and fair allocation. By prioritizing mitigation and adaptation in tandem, the international community can address the dual imperatives of preventing displacement and protecting those most at risk, building a more resilient and equitable future.
Conclusion
Rising seas, stronger storms, disappearing land have already displaced millions, with projections suggesting that these numbers will grow exponentially in the coming decades. This phenomenon has exposed glaring gaps in international legal and policy frameworks, leaving vulnerable populations to bear the brunt of a crisis they did little to create. Addressing this multifaceted issue requires a holistic approach that combines mitigation, adaptation, and legal innovation to ensure that those affected are protected, supported, and empowered.
One of the critical insights from this discussion is the intersectionality of climate displacement, which disproportionately affects marginalized communities. From low-income populations in Bangladesh to indigenous peoples in the Arctic and small island nations in the Pacific, the impact of climate change magnifies existing social and economic inequalities. Women, children, and the elderly are particularly vulnerable, as they often face limited access to resources and decision-making processes in the aftermath of displacement. Without targeted interventions, these inequities will deepen, further exacerbating the humanitarian and social consequences of climate-induced migration. Thus, any solution must prioritize equity and inclusivity, placing the needs of the most vulnerable at the forefront of policy responses.
The legal frameworks governing displacement have proven inadequate in addressing the unique challenges posed by climate migration. The 1951 Refugee Convention, a cornerstone of international protection, fails to account for those fleeing environmental disasters, leaving climate migrants without legal recourse. While regional agreements and national policies have made some progress, their scope is limited and inconsistent. The need for an international treaty or protocol specifically tailored to climate displacement is becoming increasingly urgent. Such a framework would not only recognize climate migrants as a distinct group deserving of protection but also provide mechanisms for resettlement, temporary protection, and access to basic human rights. However, achieving this requires overcoming significant political and financial obstacles, underscoring the need for global cooperation and shared responsibility. Ultimately, addressing the climate displacement crisis is as much a moral imperative as it is a practical necessity. Failure to act will not only perpetuate human suffering but also destabilize regions, strain international relations, and undermine global development goals. Mitigation efforts must focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions to prevent the worst impacts of climate change, while adaptation strategies must empower communities to build resilience against inevitable environmental changes. Legal innovations must be complemented by robust financial and technical support to ensure that displaced populations can rebuild their lives with dignity. By adopting a comprehensive and collaborative approach, the international community can rise to this challenge and forge a future that is more equitable, sustainable, and just.
“Climate change is a terrible problem, and it absolutely needs to be solved. It deserves to be a huge priority.”
— Bill Gates
In conclusion, climate-induced displacement represents a defining challenge for humanity, requiring urgent action across multiple dimensions. As the crisis unfolds, the time to act is now—to prevent further displacement, protect those already affected, and build a resilient global framework that safeguards the rights and dignity of all individuals. The solutions to this crisis are within reach, but their realization demands the collective will of nations, communities, and individuals committed to a shared vision of a better future.
[1] Institute for Economics and Peace, Over one billion people at threat of being displaced by 2050 due to environmental change, conflict and civil unrest. (2020)
Available at: https://www.economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ecological-Threat-Register-Press-Release-27.08-FINAL.pdf
[2] The 1951 Refugee Convention, April 22, 1954, 189 U.N.T.S. 150
[3] Global Compact for Migration, December 19, 2018, A/RES/73/195
[4] IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
[5] Oppenheimer, M., Glavovic, B., Hinkel, J., et al. (2019). Sea Level Rise and Implications for Low-Lying Islands, Coasts, and Communities. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.
[6] Martinez, I., et al. (2018). “Hurricane Maria’s Long-Term Impact on Puerto Rico.” Journal of Disaster Research, 13(5), 910–921.
[7] Ionesco, D., Mokhnacheva, D., & Gemenne, F. (2017). The Atlas of Environmental Migration. Routledge.
[8] Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2013). “Future Flood Losses in Major Coastal Cities.” Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 802–806.
[9] Bradshaw, S., & Fordham, M. (2015). “Double Jeopardy: Gender and Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(1), 53–66.
[10] McAdam, J. (2012). Climate Change, Forced Migration, and International Law. Oxford University Press.
[11] Ford, J. D., Pearce, T., & Duerden, F. (2016). “Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the Arctic.” Regional Environmental Change, 16(3), 595–602.
[12] Campbell, J. R., & Warrick, O. (2014). Climate Change and Migration Issues in the Pacific. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
[13] Bradshaw, S., & Fordham, M. (2015). “Double Jeopardy: Gender and Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(1), 53–66.
[14] WHO. (2021). Climate Change and Health. World Health Organization
[15] Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmermann, J., & Nicholls, R. J. (2015). “Future Coastal Population Growth and Exposure to Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Flooding.” Global Environmental Change, 31, 152–162.
[16] McMichael, C., Katonivualiku, M., & Powell, T. (2020). “Placing Climate Change Adaptation in the Pacific Islands: Community, Context, and Relationality.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 3(3), 597–617
[17] McAdam, J. (2012). Climate Change, Forced Migration, and International Law. Oxford University Press.
[18] Beyani, C. (2014). The Kampala Convention on Internally Displaced Persons. Oxford University Press.
[19] Harman, S. (2021). “Australia’s Climate Migration Dilemma: Policy Challenges for Pacific Island Displacement.” Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(4), 935–951.
[20] McAdam, J. (2012). Climate Change, Forced Migration, and International Law. Oxford University Press.
[21] Burkett, M. (2011). “Climate Refugees and the UNHCR.” Environmental Law, 41(2), 345–365.
[22] Bettini, G., Nash, S. L., & Gioli, G. (2017). “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? The Fading Contours of (In)justice in Competing Discourses on Climate Migration.” The Geographical Journal, 183(4), 348–358.
[23] Hauer, M. E. (2017). “Migration Induced by Sea-Level Rise Could Reshape the US Population Landscape.” Nature Climate Change, 7(5), 321–325.
[24] Roberts, E., & Pelling, M. (2018). “Climate Change-Related Loss and Damage: Translating the Global Policy Agenda for National Policy Processes.” Climate and Development, 10(1), 4–17.
[25] Rogelj, J., Shindell, D., Jiang, K., et al. (2016). “Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development.” Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 521–531.
[26] IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
[27] Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2013). “Future Flood Losses in Major Coastal Cities.” Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 802–806.
[28] Reyes, M. L., & Lu, A. S. (2020). “Community-Based Adaptation in the Philippines: Lessons for Effective Disaster Risk Reduction.” International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 12(4), 514–529.
[29] Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2017). “The Geographies of Community Disaster Resilience.” Global Environmental Change, 29, 65–77.
[30] Roberts, E., & Pelling, M. (2018). “Climate Change-Related Loss and Damage: Translating the Global Policy Agenda for National Policy Processes.” Climate and Development, 10(1), 4–17.
